By Ify Okoli
The continued detention of former Kaduna State Governor
Nasir El-Rufai is emerging as a potentially significant issue ahead of
Nigeria’s 2027 elections, with analysts divided over whether it will weaken
opposition politics or strengthen sympathy for him.
El-Rufai has remained in detention since February 2026 amid
corruption-related investigations and court proceedings, after being arraigned
by the Independent Corrupt Practices and Other Related Offences Commission,
ICPC, in March on money-laundering charges.
He pleaded not guilty to the charges. His detention has
since attracted wider political attention, partly because of his standing in
Northern politics and his later alignment with the opposition African
Democratic Congress, ADC, after years as a prominent figure within the All
Progressives Congress, APC.
The controversy has also raised questions among some
Nigerians over whether the case is being driven purely by corruption
investigations or whether political considerations are also involved. Analysts
say that perception, rather than the legal case alone, could shape its
electoral consequences.
Political scientist Dr Kabiru Said Sufi said the eventual
political effect would depend largely on how voters understand the case. He
said some Nigerians viewed it as an elitist struggle, while others saw it as
another confrontation within the political class.
Sufi, however, said public anger over El-Rufai’s detention
appeared to have fallen considerably since the controversy first emerged. He
also pointed to what he described as the opposition’s failure to maintain
sustained pressure over the issue.
“Surprisingly, even the opposition itself has been somehow
quiet,” Sufi said, suggesting that the APC government could benefit politically
from El-Rufai’s absence while the matter remains within the courts.
According to Sufi, El-Rufai’s importance as an opposition
strategist means his detention has removed a significant political operator
from active participation. He argued that the government had effectively
shifted the controversy towards the judiciary, reducing the immediate political
anger surrounding it.
“For now, the way it will help the APC is that one of the
strategists of the opposition has been taken out of the equation,” Sufi said,
while warning that the calculation could change if public anger returns.
Political commentator Comrade Aminu Rabiu Kano similarly
described El-Rufai as an unusually influential political figure, stressing his
record as a former governor, prominent Northerner and politician who played a
significant role in the emergence of the APC.
Kano said the Federal Government could continue presenting
the case as an issue of accountability and the rule of law. But he warned that
prolonged detention could create a competing political narrative if voters
begin to interpret the proceedings as persecution.
“Detaining a politician can restrict his physical
participation in politics, but it does not necessarily eliminate his political
influence,” Kano said, noting that perception could prove more politically
important than the legal arguments surrounding the case.
He also rejected the idea that Northern voters should be
treated as one political bloc. Security, economic conditions, government
performance, candidates, alliances and local political structures, he said,
would all influence how voters respond to the controversy in 2027.
“If people predominantly see it as a genuine legal process,
its electoral impact may be limited,” Kano said. “If, however, a significant
section of the electorate comes to perceive it as political persecution, then
it could become a useful mobilising issue for the opposition.”
Comrade Umar Muhammad Kofar Naisa, Country Director of the
Society for Educational Development and Socio-Democratic Activities, SEDSAC,
offered a more direct warning, saying the detention could ultimately damage the
APC by creating sympathy for the former governor.
“Continued detention of El-Rufai could hurt the APC,
especially because he has many supporters as a former governor. It could
generate sympathy among the people, and that sympathy may turn into votes on
election day,” Kofar Naisa told journalists.
He also linked El-Rufai to the political history of
President Bola Tinubu’s administration, arguing that the former governor had
played a role in helping bring the administration to power. His subsequent
arrest, Kofar Naisa said, had further affected public perceptions of the
government.
“His arrest has further damaged the government’s image
because people see it as going after opposition figures,” he said, while
warning that the controversy could also unsettle members of the APC who may
become less willing to challenge government decisions.
Kofar Naisa argued that prolonged detention could make some
party members fearful that openly disagreeing with the Federal Government might
eventually expose them to similar treatment. Such concerns, he said, could
affect confidence and political courage within the ruling party.
The issue has also drawn criticism from Emir of Kano
Muhammadu Sanusi II, who questioned the consistency of Nigeria’s
anti-corruption campaign while referring specifically to El-Rufai’s case.
Speaking to Channels Television in Lagos, Sanusi said
Nigeria had institutions and courts responsible for investigating and
prosecuting corruption, but stressed that such powers needed to be applied
consistently. He cited El-Rufai’s detention as an example.
“An example is my brother Nasir El-Rufai who’s been denied
bail. He’s been in detention for seven months, not having been convicted for
anything,” Sanusi said, questioning whether cases such as this could be viewed
solely through the lens of the anti-corruption campaign.
With the 2027 elections approaching, El-Rufai’s case
therefore carries competing political possibilities. His absence could
temporarily reduce opposition organisation, but continued detention could also
deepen sympathy, sharpen perceptions of political persecution and turn the case
into an opposition campaign issue.
Ultimately, analysts say its electoral significance will
depend on the course of the legal proceedings, public perception and how
effectively both the APC and opposition parties use the controversy during the
campaign.
Post a Comment